Betting Maximizer Review – Is Betting Maximizer Scam?

July 31st, 2010

So does the Betting Maximizer Betfair money making opportunity really work? This is a downloadable guide that contains 2 horse laying systems. The main guide is not lengthy and filled with hundreds of pages of fluff like many other betting guides are. Rather, punters will only find 20+ pages of information that go right to the core of the laying systems.

1. Is Betting Maximizer Just Another Scam?

As an instantly downloadable ebook guide, I was able to start applying the steps on the very same day I got it. I was also able to check the past results that these laying systems got in the past and they looked consistently profitable.

Of course, past results are no indication of future performance, but it certainly gives you more confidence that the systems have a chance of working in the future. One lay system is for flat and the other is for jumps racing.

2. The Experience of Using The Betting Maximizer To Make Money

This betting system does produce a positive Return on Investment over the long run that easily pays for the commissions punters have to pay for the Betfair commissions. This has been a valuable strategy that I have added to my betting portfolio and have only recently started using real money with it. Punters are advised to paper test this unique system first before betting with any real money to get used to the rules and trading techniques.

3. Betting Using The Betting Maximizer Step By Step Rules

Besides the profits that I am making, I am also having more fun watching my favorite horse races now and not experiencing the occasional huge losing days that I used to have before. Every step taught in this guide is based on logic and conservative money management rules. By placing your bets on Betfair, you are actually betting against other punters rather than a bookmaker, giving you a much higher chance of profiting in the long run.

Is Betting Maximizer System a scam? Visit http://www.top-review.org/bettingmaximizer.htm to read a FREE report about this Betfair Profiting Blueprint and get a FREE Betting Maximizer Bonus Download!

Gamblers Fallacy Does Not Help Roulette Systems

July 30th, 2010

There is one thing that will destroy you if you are not careful. I’ve seen this one thing completely annihilate the bankrolls of new players to online roulette studs. It doesn’t matter if you have been around forever, or if you are just starting out.

The one thing that I’m talking about is known as The Gambler’s Fallacy. The Gambler’s Fallacy has been tricking players into making bad bets for centuries, possibly longer than that. If you take your money seriously you must be constantly vigilant against The Gambler’s Fallacy.

To sum it up quickly The Gambler’s Fallacy is the wrongly held belief that past random acts of probability will influence future random acts of probability. For example if a coin is flipped three times in a row and lands on heads, the next flip is not more likely to be tails.

The idea that the roulette table has some sort of memory and makes things balance out is entirely false. The roulette table does not care about what the last spin was, and before every spin the odds are reset to what they normally are.

What makes The Gambler’s Fallacy so deadly is that if somebody who is not versed in mathematics looks at a simple version of the odds it would appear that there is no fallacy. The math would indicate that no such fallacy exists.

Most people look at the math and then make wrong conclusions from the brief overview of the odds. This would make it look like there is no Gambler’s Fallacy. But I will show you where they go wrong, and how to look at the odds properly.

Imagine that zero is not a factor at the online roulette table. This would make the odds of the ball landing on red 50%. Now if one looks at the math they will see that the chance of the ball landing on red is smaller than 50% and for three times it is even smaller, and so forth. So the chance of the ball landing on red several times in a row is drastically smaller than 50%, and the odds of the ball landing on black are 50%. So at first it looks like it is way more likely to go black after several reds. But when the math is done the odds of the ball going red, red, red, black and red, red, red, red are exactly the same.

Now that you know that The Gambler’s Fallacy will steer you the wrong way you can now improve your online roulette play. There’s no reason to let an idea suck away funds from your bankroll. Your bankroll should be for online roulette, not for feeding a gambling horror.

It doesn’t matter which system you use, it’s important that you play Online Roulette at the best casinos. The best casinos are the ones with the quick payment times, one of them is Bet365 Casino

Crimson Tide Fends Off Feisty Vols

July 29th, 2010

Alabama didn’t so much win their game against Tennessee on Saturday as much as they escaped. Despite playing one of their worst games of the year they managed to keep their undefeated season alive as nose tackle Terrance Cody blocked a potential game winning field goal on the last play of the game to preserve a 12-10 victory for the Crimson Tide. Alabama held a tenuous 12-3 lead late in the game before a Tennessee touchdown and recovered onside kick had them facing the specter of the defeat for the first time this season. Instead, Alabama improved to 8-0 while Tennessee slipped to 3-4.

College football pointspread players who took Tennessee as +14 road underdogs were in good shape throughout the contest and eventually cashed their tickets. The Vols improved to 4-3 against the spread while the Crimson Tide dropped to 5-3 versus the number. The 22 combined points went well UNDER the posted total of 41′. Tennessee has gone UNDER in 4 of 7 while ‘bama evened their college football totals record at 4-4.

After the game, Cody recounted his blocked field goal attempt:

“I didn’t really get off the ground. I just reached my arm up. That’s how I got it. I knocked the blocker back. He was on his back.”

First year Tennessee coach Lane Kiffin wasn’t about to call the near miss loss a ‘moral victory’:

“It’s a difficult loss to deal with. You come into a hostile environment and play the No. 1 team in the country, as I said before by far the No. 1 team in the country and the best-coached team around. You come in here and outgain them by nearly 100 yards and miss three field goals. I don’t believe in moral victories, we should have won that game.”

He explained the difficulty that placekicker Daniel Lincoln has getting elevation on his kicks since a quadriceps injury:

“He can’t kick the ball up high. If you kick the ball up high it’s never going to get there, so we can’t allow the penetration up front.”

Alabama coach Nick Saban views the game as a learning experience:

“You talk about how fragile a season is. You’re controlling a game, even though you may say it’s winning ugly. We’re still ahead 12-3 and totally controlling the game with 3 minutes, 29 seconds and the ball. That’s how fragile a season can be. You make one mistake and you have to go overcome it. I hope that there’s a lot of lessons our team can learn from this.”

Alabama has a week off before a tough game at home against LSU on November 7. They’ll play at Mississippi State the following week before a game against FCS Chattanooga on November 21. Tennessee hosts South Carolina next Saturday and Memphis the following week. They’ll play at Ole Miss on November–.

Ross Everett is a widely published freelance sports writer and respected authority on NFL football betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sportsbooks and sportsbook directory sites. He lives in Northern Nevada with three Jack Russell Terriers and an emu. He is currently working on an autobiography of former interior secretary James Watt.

Sports Handicapping: Tom Donaghy Accuses NBA Refs Of Wagering On Games

July 28th, 2010

Tim Donaghy, the former NBA referee makes some serious claims in his new book. He claims that refs would purposely tinker with game results, are dishonest, and would even argue about things as small as who should tip the ball boys in the NBA.

At one point in the book Donaghy brings up Dick Bavetta who was a ref in what most fans consider the worst officiated game ever: game 6 of the 2002 western conference finals. Though it’s up for discussion, he makes a very particular allegation against Mr. Bavetta:

I bet the losing team simply because I was certain they would cover the spread, even if they played the game badly. This is when Mr. Bavetta shows up.

From when I first got involved with him, I quickly learned that he prefers to keeps game close, and when a team gets down by double digit points, he conveniently helps the players save face. He achieves this by softly yet blowing the whistle regularly on the team that is having the better night. Fouls suddely became on sided and the score began to tighten. This is how Bavetta refs a game, and everyone knew it. ”

Working off of the assumption this was true it should mean that if you bet on underdogs in all the games Bavetta officiated you should have positively cleaned up even with any sports handicapping issues. I’m not saying you would win every game; that would be ridiculous. But the way Donaghy describes it, he made a killing with this betting theory.

I had been interested therefore I performed a number of investigations and the outcomes were very darn persuading that Donaghy is full of crap. Should you not understand, you must hit 52.7% of the wagers to generate a profit if you are wagering with common 10 cent juice ($110 to win $100). Donaghy was pressured out following the 2006-07 season therefore I looked over the 10 year period prior to that period and here are a few things I discovered.

During the ten year period there were just two seasons that returned a profitable percent when betting on the underdogs in games where Bavetta was working. These two seaons were 1998/1999 when the underdogs came back at 55.7% and 2001/2002 when they made it to 57.1. This isn’t bad, but remember these were the only two seasons that returned at least 52.7%. Actually, if you made bets based on this theory, you would have lost a great deal of money in nearly every other basketball season.

In my opnion, this research blows apart the Bavetta theory put forth by Mr. Donaghy and should make everyone question the truth of other statements he has made. I’m not suggesting that the NBA should not be held responsible, and that the referees do a bad job from time to time, or that you should just disregard sports handicapping and follow foolish betting theories, but we need to question this whether or not the rest of Donaghy’s comments are truthful. If he was dishonest regarding such an important issue, we cannpt take his other claims seriously.

Rich Allen is an expert in Sports Handicapping and his Sports Betting Professor Systems have sold over 250,000 units and cover all major sports including horse racing. Download a FREE copy of The Sports Betting Insider’s Guide at: http://richallensports.com/sports-handicapping

Iowa Survives Tough Test Against Michigan State

July 27th, 2010

Iowa quarterback Ricky Stanzi completed a 7 yard touchdown pass to Marvin McNutt as time expired, allowing the Hawkeyes to take a 15-13 road win over Michigan State University and preserve their undefeated season. Trailing 6-3 at halftime, Iowa mounted a furious drive after Michigan State had scored to take a 13-9 lead with 1:37 remaining in the game. Iowa moved to 8-0 for the first time in school history for the win, and has won twelve straight games overall. Michigan State evened their record at 4-4 with the loss.

When you bet on college football you learn that you can’t count your money until the game was over and such was the case here as Iowa even managed to cover the pointspread as they won outright as +2 road underdogs. Iowa improved to 5-2 against the spread while Michigan State dropped to 3-4 against the number. The 28 combined points went UNDER the posted total of 42′. The Spartans have gone UNDER in four of their seven games while the Hawkeyes have played UNDER the total in 5 of 7.

Stanzi threw three incomplete passes into the end zone before he hit McNutt with the game winner. There were 2 seconds left on the clock when the play began, Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz commended McNutt on his effort to get open on the play:

“He made a nice break inside, made a great grab.”

Ferentz was also proud of the way his team responded after falling behind late on the road:

“It speaks to our players, the character that they have. They realized they still had time.”

Michigan State coach Mark Dantonio also praised his players for their tough defensive stand at the end of the game:

“When we scored at the end, I thought that we had it. I’m proud — not happy. Proud of the way our football team responded.”

The Hawkeyes became only the second team in Big Ten history to win at Penn State, Michigan State and Wisconsin in the same season. Michigan was the first to accomplish the trifecta when they did it in 1997.

Michigan State will take to the road next weekend for a game at Minnesota. They’ll host Western Michigan the following Saturday before playing away at Purdue on November 14. Iowa will play their next two games at home, starting with Indiana next Saturday. They’ll host Northwestern a week later.

Ross Everett is a widely published widely published freelance sports writer and respected authority on soccer betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sportsbooks and sportsbook directory sites. He lives in Southern Nevada with three Jack Russell Terriers and a kangaroo. He is currently working on an autobiography of former energy secretary Donald Hodell.

 

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in /home/netj8e/public_html/wp-content/themes/Get-Started-Casino/footer.php on line 5